I first met Jack Osborn in the mid-eighties at the Arizona Open and told him how excited I was about the prospects of public courts in San Francisco and throughout the land. He gave me a cold look and said brusquely as he turned away, "In this country, croquet is a sport for the elite class."
And it really was, back then, because that's the way he created it.
It's much too soon to write my own memoir, but the recent publication by the USCA of it's 40-year retrospective has jolted me into a response. The USCA NEWS history is well and thoroughly done, and yet it suggested that the USCA headquarters facility--the National Croquet Center--was not completed until 2008. It's an understandable oversight--10 years is a long time to remember what happened, and not everyone reads Croquet World. But in fact, the USCA staff, housed with my own office in the Center's maintenance shed, waiting for the clubhouse to be completed and for a Certificate of Occupancy, moved into the completed and fully furnished clubhouse in early May of 2002.
Who should run the USCA's headquarters facility?
Chuck Steuber's stroke more than six months before the clubhouse was occupied ended his role as the manager and financer of the Center. Because it was the national headquarters of the USCA, some believed that the USCA should have the main voice in how it was run and so a succession of people were enlisted to tell me what to do while others insisted in vain, "Just let Bob do his job." My "advisors"--however well-intentioned--were not interested in my development plan and thought they needed to give me ad hoc direction about what needed to be done.
Lots of shouting matches occurred in the maintenance shed office I shared with Archie Peck and my membership director in late 2001 and early 2002. More than once, I had to say, "I can't take this any more," and that was when we were planning to host the first WCF world championship at the Center in February of 2002, which Chuck had agreed to finance as our way of promoting the Center to the world. Tony Hall and I had made a "gentleman's agreement" in San Francisco during one of his WCF presidential tours to confirm the date.
It was the first Golf Croquet World Championship in America, and the first WCF title event for 80 players. It seemed to me at the time that the USCA committee--headed by "bad boy Mehas"-- did everything they could to screw it up. They told Tony Hall at one point not to communicate with me at all. (He responded bluntly but politely, "I'm going to continue to communicate with the manager of the host facility....")
This committee, incredibly, declined the offers of many competent and experienced golf croquet referees around the world to come at their own expense and referee. Instead, the USCA appointed a well-intentioned local croquet bigwig to "train" a corps of volunteer referees--mostly people who actually played Golf Croquet, but not at a high level.
This USCA committee, incredibly, neglected to select all 80 players allotted and instead cancelled the Qualifying tournament and invited them all to play in the main event.
Despite all this, I orchestrated an elegant Opening Day, with much ceremony--including for a brass quartet for fanfares and a 60-member chorus to underscore the celebration. As it happened, record-breaking rainfall marred the opening day, and the assistance of Anne Frost-Robinson, visiting from Canada, turned out to be crucially important in making everything work--including moving the performances and ceremonies inside to the Festival Tent attached to the maintenance shed.
Despite what surely must be the poorest quality of refereeing ever allowed in a major WCF event, it all worked out. At that time, the Egyptians probably deserved to win the top four places--although I had private doubts about a refereeing call against Reg Bamford in the quarter-finals knockout.
Filling in some critical blanks
An official history cannot be blamed for failing to mention the disastrous succession of managers of the USCA HQ that followed Bob Alman's departure in the middle of 2003, and it very properly gives due credit to David McCoy for putting the headquarters facility on an even financial keel since taking over the presidency of the Croquet Foundation of America, the Center's owner. in 2009.
But I hope to be forgiven for filling in some of the blanks that we now know were created by the mysterious disappearance of all the Center's membership records, both digital and hard-copy, during the administration of my immediate successor, who had fired my membership director early on and who suddenly decamped with his family to Australia before the end of the season and before he could be prosecuted.
At this point, we might quote from a May 2007 CROQUET WORLD article:
"After the departure in July of 2003 of Bob Alman, who had started promoting club enrollments in late 2000 and opened the club on the completed lawns in December of 2000, there was virtually no pro-active onsite marketing and development until Mike Jenner was hired in the spring of 2004. By the time Jenner started his one-year tenure in the spring of 2004, the membership structures vital for development had already been fatally compromised in various ways, and Jenner make it clear to everyone that "membership is not the priority." Jenner concentrated on event marketing and cutting expenses. By the end of Jenner's one-year tenure, membership activities and morale were at an all-time low. Jenner had eliminated the novice-level "associate" membership, which had been the driving engine of membership growth for two years. Membership numbers began a precipitous decline.Steuber had told Alman in 2000, "Give yourself the title and the salary you need," and that salary was little more than half what the subsequent managers were paid--the then prevailing "club manager" rate of $64,000.
But those are mere numbers, and this story is not really about membership numbers of the headquarters facility or of the USCA. It's written to note a truly remarkable shift in the nature of the core membership of the national association in America.
A seismic shift in the culture
When I moved to Florida in 2000 to organize and manage the new national headquarters facility, croquet in America was still, to a large extent "a sport for the affluent class." Jack Osborn, the brilliant entreprenuer who created the USCA, had told me this at the Arizona Open, only fifteen years before Steuber hired me. I had wanted to tell him how excited I was about persuading the city of San Francisco to build two public courts for our club in a city park. It would be the first in the country, and.... But instead of being pleased, he was clearly annoyed.
At that time--more than 30 years ago, less than a decade after the USCA's founding--it was much too soon to have people believe that just anybody could play the sport of croquet.
Osborn, coming out of the world of advertising in Manhattan, had cobbled together the unique American Rules in a compromise among the five founding clubs, and then wisely chose to publicize croquet as a sport for the wealthy. This was easy to do because it was actually true, thanks to the Swopes' popularizing croquet among the celebrity set in the 20's and 30's, including the Hollywood elite. In large part, "a sport for the affluent class" was a self-fulfilling prophecy. The wealthy, after all, had the money to build courts and to get them built or designated at country clubs and resorts. And the celebrities drew plenty of press to help him promote "the fastest-growing sport in America."
Ironically, the "flagship" club of the USCA for many years was the New York Croquet Club in Central Park, founded by Osborn with the considerable assistance of Joseph Tankoos and others well known to the city administration. The first nine national championships were played there on it's public lawns. It is still an important croquet club, although its two lawns are still shared with bowlers, on public turf.
The San Francisco Croquet Club--which I successfully re-organized and expanded on public turf with my very gifted and supportive board--also began on public turf, through the influence of wealthy and influence socialites, including Steve Swig, whose family owned the Fairmont Hotel, ably assisted by Tom McDonnell. That's where the resemblance with the East Coast establishment ended.
Despite Osborn's apparent scorn for "public court croquet," the San Francisco Croquet Club succeeded hugely as a club which welcomed anyone, visibly and loudly. It was for many years the only club on public turf with two built-for-croquet courts. It attracted young and sporty players who became national champions. For a half-dozen years in the 90's, its 64-person open tournament on as many as seven lawns was stronger in player strength than the USCA nationals on the East Coast.
"Western Killers" pressed for change
The San Francisco Croquet Club, acknowledged for a decade as "the club of champions" was also a strong focus for Osborn's verbal violence against us, in the late eighties, with words like "Western Killers." His editorial on the subject in the USCA Croquet Gazette was probably the one thing that finally brought him down as president of the organization he so brilliantly founded and developed.
A few years later, when he died, I wrote an editorial that described as well as I could who he was and what he achieved, along with the aspects of a personality that could sometimes be rough. I have been gratified to find that my obituary is the most quoted and reprinted. It constitutes the entire Wikipedia entry on Osborn, verbatim, albeit unattributed. (My policy has been to NOT write an obit on a croquet personage unless it can be reasonably accurate and complete in my experience. Thus I have written obits on Osborn, Ellery McClatchy, Chuck Steuber, and others, but not on other figures with whom I worked whose interesting flaws were very much a part of their personae, vitally relevant to how they lived their lives, but not widely known. For them, I only linked to the tributes others wrote about them, from this magazine's home page.
Perhaps Chuck Steuber had intended that the National Croquet Center serve as a bridge to the "public" for our sport. He never talked about his ultimate purposes. He tended to pick people to do the work and trusted them to do what needed to be done. Virtually all the croquet players in Palm Beach County seemed pleased with the Center, and many members of the more private facilities accepted our offer of a special "affiliate" membership at the National Croquet Club, or were party to a "reciprocal membership benefit"--including Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago.
The private clubs--the Beach Club, PGA National, and the Palm Beach Croquet Club--all started to rent the lawns of the NCC to expand their own invitationals, retaining the highlights at their own venues. So their members would come to the Center to watch some of the games in those invitationals, or to witness a major international event.
Somewhere around the spring of 2003, I chatted on the veranda with a well-known red-haired socialite there to watch a major event. The subject was membership. When I asked, she explained simply, "The reason I haven't joined is that they let the public in here." Her wealthy Palm Beach husband had discovered her in a Manhattan chorus line. She never became a member of the Center. She has since passed away.
As recently as 2008,. the Palm Beach Invitational had 66 players plus 25 SOCIAL participants--that's 90 paid participants. That was the first year the entire event was played at the Center, including the finals. The club membership has now joined the NCC and virtually surrendered their historic single court in front of the Breakers Hotel.
That "merging" of the membership of the venerable Palm Beach Croquet Club with the membership of the National Croquet Center several years ago is perhaps symbolic of the remarkable melding of the middle- and upper-class croquet playing population of the entire country.
There are now many more "open" tournaments than "invitationals" in America and some of the best-run events are played at large facilities that are either public or built and managed by entrepreneurs who welcome anyone with the price of membership to their lawns. Florida's seven-lawn Sarasota County Croquet Club, comes to mind, as well as Macey Whites' extraordinarily complete eight-lawn club at Chesapeake Bay, where the 2018 American Rules nationals are being played.
Most of the members of "the elite class" who helped Osborn make the USCA viable are gone now. Some of them were vitally important to Osborn and the sport in the early days, when an American croquet association was no more than an idea, with no courts to make it real. All of that has changed. Croquet is now as well established in America as it is in Britain. And anyone is welcome to play.
One of the string of impressive women--ladies who used their money and their social capital and sometimes their administrative expertise in service to his organization--told me in confidence, much later. "Jack's long-range vision always included public courts."
If that is true, Osborn vision has been fully realized, coast to coast, with a mix of middle class players and wealthy self-made millionaires who continue to contribute their money and their skills to croquet affairs that benefit us all.
|Back to Top||Copyright © 1996-2019 Croquet World Online Magazine. All rights reserved.|